tisite.blogg.se

1. #Ultimate windows tweaker the windows club 4.6.0.0 Patch
2. #Ultimate windows tweaker the windows club 4.6.0.0 code

You will find a good list at Wikipedia:List of monthly maintenance categories with templates. Ree dy 14:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)ĭate isn't added to issues are dated or will accept a date except "expert" - that uses a separate date=field. Provide a regex, the options you want, and the group you want to return. Ree dy 14:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC) After more requests for something that can do this functionality. Needs to be expanded further to accept regexes for matching etc. About all it gives is between the body tags splitting on the newlines.

#Ultimate windows tweaker the windows club 4.6.0.0 Patch

I've posted a patch that will add an option to work with CheckWiki URLs in a new item at the bottom of this page. Anyways, it already works well in the present way. A lazy solution would be if one could read directly the toolserver page. WP:CHECKWIKI now generates lists of articles by error type (HTML) at Ĭurrently I paste these into a text file and then use "Text file" to import them. Ree dy 18:19, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Im thinking this would be a worthwhile thing for me to get done over the Easter. Suppose this would be a good ListMaker Plugin - Ree dy 22:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC) I'm happy enough to create this for you, just you will need to work with me on making it. Then hit the "Make" button to fetch all the pages. Ideally I could select this listmaker plug-in, hit the configure button to setup the regexes and counters. I would like to get results from a tool on the Toolserver into AWB.

I don't imply we should do both directions. Magioladitis ( talk) 13:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC) The other way round (removing BLP from deads) needs two conditions: existence of death category + non existence of living people (to exclude cases of multiple people). Rjwilmsi 16:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC) Article issues accepts BLP unsourced as parameter. I would prefer the strong to change to BLP unsourced. The easy way is just to add BLP on the beginning of the string. Like what I did here - Magioladitis ( talk) 12:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC) AWB has to check for any possible redirect of unreferenced. Magioladitis ( talk) 11:47, 22 January 2010 (UTC)īased on the presence of Category:Living people ? Example diff/page? Rjwilmsi 12:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC) Yes, only based on the presence of Living people. Rjwilmsi 22:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)īLPs are becoming top priority in Wikipedia. "the 15th of May.") as it will depend on the sentence whether the correct change would be to remove the "the" as well. Rjwilmsi 10:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC) rev 6012 Added, except I'm not going to change when the date is preceded by "the" (e.g. Perhaps we can review this to find situations where AWB can make the change.

#Ultimate windows tweaker the windows club 4.6.0.0 code

I can give you some regex code to do some of this if it will help but I am not the best at it so on of the AWB developers would need to look it over.- Kumioko ( talk) 01:05, 23 December 2009 (UTC) I can't remember the detail but I was concerned that changing text like "the 15th of September 2009" to "the 15 September 2009" would not make for elegant sentences. I havent edited in a few months so that may have changed. There is logic to do some of the #th stuff and the of Month X though. Magioladitis ( talk) 22:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC) This has been talked about in the past but the last I remember was that it was decided it was too difficult to do all of it as a standard edit in AWB. (Not removing “th” could be probably considered a bug, because AWB usually does that.) Svick ( talk) 19:58, 22 December 2009 (UTC) It has to fix 15th of September 2009 as well. AWB fixes, when there is “of” between month and year, but not when it's between day and month.

Magioladitis ( talk) 19:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC) I didn't find this kind of date among the unit tests, so it isn't a bug. This seems like a bug to me because they should and I thought they did. Dates like “15th of September 2009” should be fixed to “15 September 2009”.